Well, as much as you'd here the phrase "Hit two birds with the same stone." It made me think about a question that would tell a lot about a person.

Which are you? The Bird.... or the Stone?

To what the question means I cannot tell, or the or the results will fail to be revealed and it won't work, so CHOOSE WISELY! The bird? or the stone?
Once I've gotten about 8 results from people, I'll reveal what the two mean.
But be patient, and you must be willing to find out. :)

Good Luck! And remember... CHOOSE WISELY! Take you time, no rush.

I am the second bird, not being hit primary, but hit by secondary residuals of the original occurrence.

Im the stone...I coulda meant to hit no birds and f*cked up big time or I coulda meant to hit one bird and gotten waaaay lucky.

The thrower XD

um.. the bird~

Edit:
Cos everyone is saying which bird they want to be, I'll be bird one.
The one that's suppose to get hit first I guess?

wow, this is very interesting, I'll reduce the limit to about six people, the results are just flooding in so fast on the way yall answer. But that doesn't mean you don't have to take it lightly, you should still choose wisely or it won't work.

I'd be the second bird, always hurt by total chance of me being at the wrong place at the wrong time. Meh. Or the stone. Hm... My final choice is:

The stone.

I want to be the stone. Poor birds.

I'm probably a bird.

stone

Ok, this may be quite confusing, but the more you think about it, the more you'll understand... I hope. The first bird, represents individuals in life who choose to be free and fight for liberty. Who, in dark times will be the first to fight back, and gain other followers as he goes. Thus, as a result some may be killed or murdered, and become martyrs of nationalism.
------------------
The second bird represents a common person, somoneone who lives his/her life as any other person in the world. But when an individual starts a rebellion, a fight for freedom, they might gain a sign of confidence, thus becoming disciples of the individual, and fight with the individual for liberty. Which leads in contrast with Bird one, as the first bird may be killed while in their retalliation fo liberty, the second bird follows and are killed as a result of being moved by confidence. In other words, the second bird is just killed because it was following the first bird.
---------------
Now, the stone, the stone represents those who are in favor of power, and the ability of authority. The stone is the one who makes the descision, chooses who lives, or who dies, the stone may be on the ground in a peaceful state, or may be speeding through the air in pursuit of a target. The stone has control of the fate of others. Thus, in contrast with the birds, it is the one who strikes and kills the birds, ending their retalliation for freedom.

Now, I'm not saying yall people are gonna go out there and set the white house on fire, go follow some dude who all of a sudden feels like tagging along with somone who wants to go committ some vandalism just because of the fact that they don't like somone or what they're doing. Or go going out there and pop someone because they didn't do as they're told. Just saying of how your personality is. Here are just the basics of what they mean

First bird: Fights for what's right, and takes action in making it that way

Second bird: regular type of person who just go with the flow.

Stone: power, authority, control, all these are characteristics of those who harness power and polish it in the palm of their hands.

Thanks, I know it might not make sense, but I had a bit of distractions when I was typing this, and could not think right( my dad was watching "The Guardian" in the background...-.-'

that's quite interesting since i never thought about the second bird in this way..

I always thought the second bird is the stupid bird because it doesn't know how to avoid the stone after the first bird is hit.

wow, so you do kinda understand... good (phew)... meim yours sounds pretty reasonable as well. Although, it is kinda insulting... in a way.

Well the saying is actually "To kill two birds with one stone" (i.e. meaning to do two things at the same time while you have the opportunity)

So...

1. the first bird is dead
2. the second bird is dead
3. the stone is flung/thrown/launched/catapulted by another thing

either way, neither the birds or the stone has any authority, and they're all life-less so I think your fortune telling thing doesn't really work.

the birds have "authority", they're acting freely and self-willed, that's why it works for the birds. in fact, all people who mentioned the stone as their "character" in this situation probably are the thrower.. that's it, i think.

btw; the birds are dead, of course, but this question is not about the situation after the birds are hit.. it wouldn't make any sense, anyways, since the bird would have finished his action, too.
well, i kinda like it even if it's very simple.

Thanks for the support heheheh:heh:

i might think like ........ the stone?

I chose the second stone simply because when I'm in pain, I don't take others down with me (which is what the first bird did). I didn't really find it too accurate. Then again, I don't feel real comfortable connecting myself to either.

I always thought the second bird is the stupid bird because it doesn't know how to avoid the stone after the first bird is hit.

I actually second that statement.

the birds have "authority", they're acting freely and self-willed, that's why it works for the birds. in fact, all people who mentioned the stone as their "character" in this situation probably are the thrower.. that's it, i think.

btw; the birds are dead, of course, but this question is not about the situation after the birds are hit.. it wouldn't make any sense, anyways, since the bird would have finished his action, too.
well, i kinda like it even if it's very simple.

Yeah I thought of that, but you have to make assumptions in order to come to that conclusion and I was just talking about what was stated. You're right if those assumptions are correct. It's just that the question wasn't that discrete so it was harder to interpret.

thats right, the whole question was a little unclear.. especially because the only mentioned possibility were bird and stone, there was not even the second bird.
but, if you ask the question in another way, the picture works ^^