Toshihiko
July 23rd, 2007, 11:56 am
Hey, after todays Irc discussion...
Let's talk about Hikikomoris (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hikikomori) and Introverts~ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introversion)
It's not like Emos for those that wish to argue that...
A cute anime for this is NHK...
The Hikikomori syndrome has been blamed over and over in controversial cases when outside (mostly internet) influences are detected... So as an online community do we discourage this or encourage our members to spend 24/7 devoted? It really is about what people choose right? but is it a false happiness...?
Introversion is a more popular term in the US, but it's taken much more lightly. As seen in the recent case of Jet Li's declaration as an introvert for publicity.
Is it a problem increasing due to the rise of computer? Is it inherent (if that were the case, wouldn't shut ins die out due to lack of reproduction)? or is it due to traumatic experiences in the lives of individuals... Is there a reason to even blame anything? I don't know... I'm still undecided on this. So... Someone help convince me. And show me where to draw the line.
Difference from Emos (stereotype wise~)
1.Not as much masochism...
2.Subjects are mostly isolated due to inability to interact, or fear... not out of disdain...
3.Their outer appearance is determined by the individual and there is no "look". Though they do have an image of lower standards in some areas -.-;
4.They still contribute to mainstream economics dealing in corporations and such... just not physically.
5.It is a condition that can be claimed as an excuse for certain actions... (you can't claim to be emo and use it as an excuse to hurt people)
6.Hikikomoris are more against physical contact... so net relations are more stressed.
Let's talk about Hikikomoris (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hikikomori) and Introverts~ (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Introversion)
It's not like Emos for those that wish to argue that...
A cute anime for this is NHK...
The Hikikomori syndrome has been blamed over and over in controversial cases when outside (mostly internet) influences are detected... So as an online community do we discourage this or encourage our members to spend 24/7 devoted? It really is about what people choose right? but is it a false happiness...?
Introversion is a more popular term in the US, but it's taken much more lightly. As seen in the recent case of Jet Li's declaration as an introvert for publicity.
Is it a problem increasing due to the rise of computer? Is it inherent (if that were the case, wouldn't shut ins die out due to lack of reproduction)? or is it due to traumatic experiences in the lives of individuals... Is there a reason to even blame anything? I don't know... I'm still undecided on this. So... Someone help convince me. And show me where to draw the line.
Difference from Emos (stereotype wise~)
1.Not as much masochism...
2.Subjects are mostly isolated due to inability to interact, or fear... not out of disdain...
3.Their outer appearance is determined by the individual and there is no "look". Though they do have an image of lower standards in some areas -.-;
4.They still contribute to mainstream economics dealing in corporations and such... just not physically.
5.It is a condition that can be claimed as an excuse for certain actions... (you can't claim to be emo and use it as an excuse to hurt people)
6.Hikikomoris are more against physical contact... so net relations are more stressed.