Log in

View Full Version : Mario Seven Stars



RD
April 10th, 2005, 01:53 am
OMFG! ive heard of this game and ive been waiting for it because i thought it was a mario game for like he ps2(only because square dosnt like to make alot of games for nintendo any more...)and i only thought it was coming out soon and the article was a preveiw because the grafics were so good and can be in a grafic group with some of the games today! ends up its for the snes...i want a remake for it on the gameboy advance... it can be done!

Elite666
April 10th, 2005, 02:39 am
Well, that would seem rather pointless to make a remake for the GBA when there's the superior Mario and Luigi: Superstar Saga on it. Why would you want one anyway when a SNES and a copy of the game are readily available for quite a decent price? It would make more sense for Nintendo to spend development time on a new Mario RPG. It would be nice if they could get Square to let them use Geno and Mallow for more than just a cameo though.

Edit: Can you please use a little more punctuation and run your post through a spellcheck next time?

RD
April 10th, 2005, 04:43 am
But it's not truly a wast of money only because Mario Seven Stars was released when the N64 first came out, so every one flocked to it and forgot about SNES so not many people have the game so releasing a remake of it will make up for the money lost, but you're also right that Nintendo should just make a new Mario RPG with Squre, it would make tongs of money!

Elite666
April 10th, 2005, 05:42 am
Well, that would makes sense... if Super Mario RPG: Legend of the Seven Stars hadn't sold extremely well and been one of the SNES' most popular games. Also, I said "waste of development time", never mentioned money, I believe it would sell very well but the last thing the GBA library needs is another SNES port. I'd also prefer it if Nintendo developed one without Square-Enix considering how bad Square-Enix' games have been lately and considering Nintendo has admirably made 3 Mario RPGs without Square at least one of which is worlds better and the other two are arguably better.

RD
April 10th, 2005, 07:51 pm
I agree compleatly, but a new Mario rpg would help the cash flow into nintendo and square-enix(ewww...square-ENIX, square/squaresoft would have been better off with out enix ruining everything...)because nintendo and square have been in the dumps and being beaten by X-Box...gamecube sucks...

Elite666
April 10th, 2005, 11:47 pm
Again, you're sadly misinformed. Nintendo's financial situation is not currently lacking and Square-Enix isn't doing badly either. While Nintendo isn't first in the current generation (it does hold a debatable second place) it is still making fine profit at a very good rate. As for Square-Enix, even with poor games they don't have bad sales coming in and there's no reason to consider them for helping with any sort of a Mario RPG. Back when Super Mario RPG was released Square was the made the best RPGs on the market and Nintendo had less development resources to make games. Right now Square certainly isn't at the top of the RPG market anymore and Nintendo has more resources than the SNES days.

Also, there's a good reason why Square merged with Enix. They ran themselves into the ground. Remember a little movie by the title of Final Fantasy: the Spirits Within? That investment had them nearing bankruptcy.

RD
April 10th, 2005, 11:55 pm
i want implying nintendo and square-enix were low on cash, iwas say that they released very expensive game to make durring a period where two new systems were coming out, the Psx and N64, so releasing a game that costed them a fortune to make right when they release a new system made them lose alot of money, and re-releasing it might make up some money for what was loss.

as for square and enix, yes, i know why they merged. i just thought they could of merged with a better company or an anime sudio, that would of been so cool.

Elite666
April 11th, 2005, 02:05 am
I could argue with you about how the N64 made Nintendo tons of money even though it didn't come in first for that generation or how it would just be stupid or how the timing made tons of sense for the release of Super Mario RPG or even how it would just be stupid for Square to merge with an anime studio but I won't. I'll just sadly admit you're right because you can claim you meant anything due to your poorly written and nigh incoherent posts.

Touché, good sir, touché

RD
April 11th, 2005, 02:14 am
dido Elite666, dido. but you know what would suck? Nintendo+Square=unhappy fans, square is more on the sony/PlayStation side and barly with nintendo

hell_xtremedawg
April 20th, 2005, 02:38 pm
Mario Seven Stars rules. Period. XD (I've replayed that game over five times O.o)

shiken
April 22nd, 2005, 03:29 am
Originally posted by Elite666@Apr 11 2005, 02:05 AM
I'll just sadly admit you're right because you can claim you meant anything due to your poorly written and nigh incoherent posts.

Touché, good sir, touché
XD

I love you, and I don't even know who you are. :P

As for me, I loooved playing Super Mario RPG: LOTSS when I played Super Nintendo. I beat it probably 10 or more times. I got all the best armor and weapons too. Lazy Shell, Legendary clothing, etc. :P