A hotly debated topic. Who would win in a battle? I'll add my reasons later, but for now, my pick is batman. Remember, Superman's greatest foe is Lex Luthor.

Discuss.

This is a pretty retarded debate. If batman has Kryto, then he wins. If he doesn't, then he loses. Done.

HAHA! I JUST KILLED THIS THREAD!

Hey aren't you Al's tarded brother? :P

Anyway... I saw/read somewhere that Batman won if he had prep-time to set up traps and stuff. Or did I just dream that up? I unno..

Although my favourite of the two is Batman by far, my vote goes for Superman. If it was just those two in a fight, no gimmicks/enhancements or kryptonite, then obviously Batman doesn't stand a chance. However, I don't like the overuse of kryptonite against Superman, and I don't like how Superman is so strong that kryptonite is one of the few/main ways of harming him. Not much creativity.

in any case, chuck norris wins.

I think batman is just a really really rich geek...
But as noir said..he could prolly pull it off, and there has to be someother way to defeat superman exept for kryptonite....he could just lock him up somehow right?

Chuck Norris vs. steven Segal?
Spiderman Vs Flash?
The rock vs Triple H? (was that the dudes name?)

I say:
Norris
Spiderman (spidersense FTW)
The rock

I disagree with the Spiderman Vs. Flash one. The spidersense is useful but not in this case. Spiderman does not have the speed to move in order to block/counter Flash's attack. O_O

Actualy whenever I have seen it (very limited apart from the movies) Spidey's sense kicks in while he still can avoid the danger unless he is under the effects of some drug or etc.

Im thinking that Spidey would only have to somehow limit Flash's movement for a set ammount of time before Flash's accelerated metabolism caused him to be too exhausted to fight.